↓ Read on to watch this amazing video
This may seem like an odd question, but when you think about it, it makes sense.dog and bear kind of It looks very similar. Is there more to their relationship than the average person knows? Well, thankfully, science has some good answers about the history and classification of many animal species on Earth. A bear is indeed a bit like a big, thick dog, isn’t it? Well, let’s make sure: Are bears related to dogs? Let’s look at bears and dogs.
The main question here is about the evolutionary history of bears and dogs. When we ask whether something is “related,” we’re asking whether two animal species are genetically related to each other.
Quick answer to the question: Bears are not directly related to dogsHowever, they do have an ancient ancestor that is shared between the two species. As a second note of equal importance, if not more important, Every creature is related. Humans share a genetic ancestor with jellyfish and fungi, but these relationships are significantly More distant than our relationship to chimpanzees. The real question (and probably the more helpful one) is how closely and how far (in time) the species are related.
You’ll soon find out that the common ancestor of dogs and bears lived 62-32 million years ago. Although both animals are mammals, today they have diverged from this common ancestor. Let’s dive into more details of this relationship!
All questions concerning whether one species is “related” to another depend on evolutionary history. Essentially, what one is asking is, “How much common ancestry do these two species share?” Evolutionary research allows us (in several different ways) to look back in time and put the puzzle pieces together, allowing us to more fully understand Learn about the genetic heritage shared by all living things. If you go back far enough, all living things have an ancestor.
Humans study the interrelatedness of different species in several ways. Probably the most popular (from the public’s point of view) is the fossil evidence. We can often dig up bones or fossil imprints that clearly identify themselves as some quasi-species from which two current (existing) species may have originated. The most recent link between two species is called a common ancestor.
The second and more important way we can look at co-evolutionary history is through DNA. DNA evidence allows us to look back with relative certainty to see how things were related. When two species share extremely similar DNA, they are likely to be closely related and share a not too distant common ancestor.
What are taxonomic classifications?
As boring as it is, it’s important to understand how scientists classify living things. Without knowing the classification, we have no way of knowing whether things are related! This is a basic overview of taxonomy.
In order to understand “relatedness” on an evolutionary scale, it is important to understand the grouping system humans use to make sense of things. Taxonomy is simply the science of naming living things and grouping them into related categories.
Think of taxonomy as a pyramid, with the most general and comprehensive definitions at the top and the most specific and detailed definitions near the bottom.For example, six kingdom (the second largest group) includes plants, fungi, animals, etc. The most specific classification, species, includes closely related things such as polar bears, grizzly bears, and black bears.
Now, for the sake of the question at hand, how closely related are dogs and bears?We identified earlier that although they were not directly Related, there are taxonomic classifications that can reveal the closeness of relationships. Now, you may have come across other sources that say they are not closely related. However, the fact is that these two animals are relatively closely related!
Both dogs and bears belong to the suborder Caniformia (literally, carnivores like dogs. This taxonomic classification Includes dogs, bears, wolves, foxes, raccoons and mustelids. Many species in this order (the most specific way to identify animals) have non-retractable claws and are often omnivorous.
This suborder split off from Feliformia (cat-like carnivores), from which lions, cats, and other cats originated. Within the suborder Caniformia, nine families currently exist. Dogs and wolves belong to the family Canidae, while bears belong to the family Ursidae.
So, if you compare bears and dogs based on their suborders, they are closely related. However, they belong to different families but share the same suborder, so they are quite related in terms of families.Finally, in terms of species, they are distantly related.
in short, Dogs and bears are suborder related, but their family and species different. Overall, dogs, wolves, and bears are related in their suborders and share a not-distant common ancestor.
What was the most recent common ancestor of bears and dogs?
Now that we understand some basics of evolutionary relatedness, let’s look at the recent common ancestor Bears and dogs share! Remember, this ancestor was the forerunner of bears and wolves/dogs and a few other families.
The most recent common ancestors of bears and dogs were Miacids. Miacids are extinct and lived 62-32 million years ago. They were quite successful and survived for at least 28 million years. These extinct mammals are thought to have evolved into the modern basis of the carnivorous order, in which the caniformes and feliformes diverged. They look a lot like ermines and weasels, and some live in trees while others live on the ground.
Miacids are the basis of all modern carnivores and probably prey on anything smaller than them. As these Miacids spread, they became specialized in their ecological niche. The abundance of carnivorous and social animals in cat-rich Africa likely allowed them to evolve into the super-carnivores we know as lions and leopards. In North America and Europe, the need for more varied diets has led to the emergence of more omnivorous animals, such as those we see in bears, dogs and otters.
Next:
I am broadly interested in how human activities influence the ability of wildlife to persist in the modified environments that we create.
Specifically, my research investigates how the configuration and composition of landscapes influence the movement and population dynamics of forest birds. Both natural and human-derived fragmenting of habitat can influence where birds settle, how they access the resources they need to survive and reproduce, and these factors in turn affect population demographics. Most recently, I have been studying the ability of individuals to move through and utilize forested areas which have been modified through timber harvest as they seek out resources for the breeding and postfledging phases. As well I am working in collaboration with Parks Canada scientists to examine in the influence of high density moose populations on forest bird communities in Gros Morne National Park. Many of my projects are conducted in collaboration or consultation with representatives of industry and government agencies, seeking to improve the management and sustainability of natural resource extraction.